Re: parallel vacuum comments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: parallel vacuum comments
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Lz8qvYg5DYc3EY0GtxxOagTb66Nram4XQjLyp3jkY7og@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel vacuum comments  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: parallel vacuum comments
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 2:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:01 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've attached updated patches.
> >
>
> I have a few comments on v4-0001.
>

The new test proposed by v4-0003 is increasing the vacuum_parallel.sql
timing by more than 10 times. It appears to be taking the highest time
among all the tests in make check. I think it is because of a large
amount of data being processed by the test. I think it is good to use
it for testing of patches during development but won't be a good idea
to commit. Can we reduce its timings?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical replication - schema change not invalidating the relation cache
Next
From: Dinesh Chemuduru
Date:
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new diagnostic items for the dynamic sql