Re: Reorderbuffer crash during recovery - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Reorderbuffer crash during recovery
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LrOzJj8K+i6YzyzmQJqM2_M3xvvGsCcCZXAMgCzyLY_w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reorderbuffer crash during recovery  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Reorderbuffer crash during recovery
Re: Reorderbuffer crash during recovery
List pgsql-bugs
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:13 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> It sets the final_lsn here so that it can iterate from the start_lsn
> to final_lsn and cleanup the serialized files in
> ReorderBufferRestoreCleanup function. One solution We were thinking
> was to store the lsn of the last serialized change while serialiizing
> and set the final_lsn in the above case where it crashes like the
> below code:

Sure, we can do something on the lines what you are suggesting, but
why can't we update final_lsn at the time of serializing the changes?
If we do that then we don't even need to compute it separately during
ReorderBufferAbortOld.

Let me try to explain the problem and proposed solutions for the same.
Currently, after serializing the changes we remove the 'changes' from
ReorderBufferTXN.  Now, if the system crashes due to any reason after
that, we won't be able to compute final_lsn after the restart.  And
that leads to access violation in ReorderBufferAbortOld which is
trying to access changes list from ReorderBufferTXN to compute
final_lsn.

We could fix it by either tracking 'last_serialized_change' as
proposed by Vignesh or we could update the final_lsn while we
serialize the changes.

IIUC, commit df9f682c7bf81674b6ae3900fd0146f35df0ae2e [1] tried to fix
some related issue which leads to this another problem.  Alvaro,
Andres, do you have any suggestions?


[1] -
commit df9f682c7bf81674b6ae3900fd0146f35df0ae2e
Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Date:   Fri Jan 5 12:17:10 2018 -0300

    Fix failure to delete spill files of aborted transactions

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Planning time is high in Postgres 11.5 Compared with Postgres 10.11
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #16169: Default time output for 24:00 is 00:00