Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LiDYB6ak0g5vbyjxZhNf1RvoCY5Ckg7bWEFkwytZuD6w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup  (Asif Rehman <asifr.rehman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup  (Asif Rehman <asifr.rehman@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 8:07 PM Asif Rehman <asifr.rehman@gmail.com> wrote:

I forgot to make a check for no-manifest. Fixed. Attached is the updated patch.


Have we done any performance testing with this patch to see the benefits? If so, can you point me to the results? If not, then can we perform some tests on large backups to see the benefits of this patch/idea?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Khandekar
Date:
Subject: Re: spin_delay() for ARM
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators