Re: Support logical replication of DDLs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Li15CyyH=hJhQbSdpaeA5yyt4WCU8S0SWiGxctLyefLg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support logical replication of DDLs  (Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 4:59 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 11:24 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As we have hacked CreatePublication function for this POC, the
> > regression tests are not passing but we can easily change it so that
> > we invoke new functionality with the syntax proposed in this thread or
> > with some other syntax and we shall do that in the next patch unless
> > this approach is not worth pursuing.
> >
> > This POC is prepared by Ajin Cherian, Hou-San, and me.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150215044814.GL3391%40alvh.no-ip.org
>
> I have updated Amit's patch by including a public action "create" when
> creating publication which is turned off by default.
> Now the 'make check' tests pass. I also fixed a problem that failed to
> create tables when the table has a primary key.
>

Are these the correct set of patches? I don't see a DDL support patch.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name
Next
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: How about renaming XLogFileRead() to XLogFileOpenForRead() and XLogFileOpen() to XLogFileOpenForWrite()?