On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 7:58 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 05:16:43PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > Can we dodge adding this push call if we restrict the length of the
> > origin name to some reasonable limit like 256 or 512 and avoid the
> > need of toast altogether?
>
> We did consider just removing pg_replication_origin's TOAST table earlier
> [0], but we decided against it at that time. Maybe it's worth
> reconsidering...
>
I don't see any good reason in that email for not removing the TOAST
table for pg_replication_origin. I would prefer to remove it rather
than add protection related to its access.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.