Re: [BUG] FailedAssertion in SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [BUG] FailedAssertion in SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Lap5TYuWahq0svKu1PBCD20QGD+LLU6XWDGAUoHOnitg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUG] FailedAssertion in SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [BUG] FailedAssertion in SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:48 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:00 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Agreed not to have a test case for this.
>
> I've attached an updated patch. I've confirmed this patch works for
> all supported branches.
>

I have slightly changed the checks used in the patch, otherwise looks
good to me. I am planning to push (v11-v15) the attached tomorrow
unless there are more comments.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Maxim Orlov
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] FailedAssertion in SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: batch inserts vs. before row triggers