Re: Non-superuser subscription owners - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LRz5sCZxwCW6OtpjLtWPvRwBihQOM4jzQm6ppfpexqGA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-superuser subscription owners  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 8:02 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 5:50 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Anyway, I don't think as such there is any problem
> > > with restarting the worker even when the subscription owner is a
> > > superuser, so adjusted the check accordingly.
> >
> > LGTM.
> >
>
> Thanks. I am away for a few days so can push it only next week.
>

Pushed. I noticed that we didn't display this new subscription option
'password_required' in \dRs+:

postgres=# \dRs+

      List of subscriptions
 Name |  Owner   | Enabled | Publication | Binary | Streaming |
Two-phase commit | Disable on error | Origin | Run as Owner? |
Synchronous commit |    Conninfo     | Skip LSN

Is that intentional? Sorry, if it was discussed previously because I
haven't followed this discussion in detail.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yurii Rashkovskii
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node