Re: row filtering for logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: row filtering for logical replication
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LPh+KCALU1Eo4itWq+bYU6NzUGr4dwypMynM3Skjvv5A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: row filtering for logical replication  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: row filtering for logical replication
Re: row filtering for logical replication
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 5:33 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:42 PM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021, at 5:19 AM, Peter Smith wrote:
> >
> > AFAIK this is the latest patch available, but FYI it no longer applies
> > cleanly on HEAD.
> >
> > Peter, the last patch is broken since f3b141c4825. I'm still working on it for
> > the next CF. I already addressed the points suggested by Amit in his last
> > review; however, I'm still working on a cache for evaluating expression as
> > suggested by Andres. I hope to post a new patch soon.
>
> Is there any ETA for your new patch?
>
> In the interim can you rebase the old patch just so it builds and I can try it?
>

I have rebased the patch so that you can try it out. The main thing I
have done is to remove changes in worker.c and created a specialized
function to create estate for pgoutput.c as I don't think we need what
is done in worker.c.

Euler, do let me know if you are not happy with the change in pgoutput.c?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops
Next
From: Ajin Cherian
Date:
Subject: Re: Added schema level support for publication.