Re: [HACKERS] rewrite HeapSatisfiesHOTAndKey - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] rewrite HeapSatisfiesHOTAndKey
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LP2pu08xF=N-PSsL5npDmz29JD9xAwvhSKyqy0sximbQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] rewrite HeapSatisfiesHOTAndKey  (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] rewrite HeapSatisfiesHOTAndKey  (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think there is some chance that such a change could induce
>> regression for the cases when there are many index columns or I think
>> even when index is on multiple columns (consider index is on first and
>> eight column in a ten column table).
>>
>
> I don't see that as a problem because the routine only checks for columns
> that are passed as "interesting_cols".
>

Right, but now it will evaluate for all interesting_cols whereas
previously it would just stop at first if that column is changed.


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] safer node casting
Next
From: Pavan Deolasee
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] rewrite HeapSatisfiesHOTAndKey