Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LNmPUA3bgF+J_-n7-ge8qjEiAEEgtW0NbJ0086rnqm7w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:41 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:55 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > We can combine the tests in 015_stream_simple.pl and
> > 020_stream_binary.pl as I can't see a good reason to keep them
> > separate. Then, I think we can keep only this part with the main patch
> > and extract other tests into a separate patch. Basically, we can
> > commit the basic tests with the main patch and then keep the advanced
> > tests separately. I am afraid that there are some tests that don't add
> > much value so we can review them separately.
>
> Fixed
>

I have slightly adjusted this test and ran pgindent on the patch. I am
planning to push this tomorrow unless you have more comments.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Kerberos support broken on MSVC builds for Windows x64?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans