Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LMzXvC3Ogasy57x-_RnzZAHO4ckjUy_02Ac_NqTFDorw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction  (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>)
Responses Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction  (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> Results look pretty good. Does it help in the read-write case too?

Last time I ran the tpc-b test of pgbench (results of which are
posted earlier in this thread), there doesn't seem to be any major
gain for that, however for cases where read is predominant, you
might see better gains.

I am again planing to take that data in next few days.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuumdb --all --analyze-in-stages - wrong order?