On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 8:09 AM Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > I think a publication of ALL OBJECTS sounds intuitive. Does it mean we'll
> > > publish all DDL commands, all commit and abort operations in every
> > > database if there is such publication of ALL OBJECTS?
> > >
> >
> > Actually, I intend something for global objects. But the main thing
> > that is worrying me about this is that we don't have a clean way to
> > untie global object replication from database-specific object
> > replication.
>
> I think ultimately we need a clean and efficient way to publish (and
> subscribe to) any changes in all databases, preferably in one logical
> replication slot.
>
Agreed. I was thinking currently for logical replication both
walsender and slot are database-specific. So we need a way to
distinguish the WAL for global objects and then avoid filtering based
on the slot's database during decoding. I also thought about whether
we want to have a WALSender that is not connected to a database for
the replication of global objects but I couldn't come up with a reason
for doing so. Do you have any thoughts on this matter?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
