On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:25 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:16 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The errcontext message would become like follows:
> >
> > *Before
> > ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "test_pkey"
> > DETAIL: Key (c)=(1) already exists.
> > CONTEXT: processing remote data during "INSERT" for replication
> > target relation "public.test" in transaction 726 at 2022-02-28
> > 20:59:56.005909+09
> >
> > * After
> > ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "test_pkey"
> > DETAIL: Key (c)=(1) already exists.
> > CONTEXT: processing remote data during "INSERT" for replication
> > target relation "public.test" in transaction 726 committed at LSN
> > 0/14BFA88 and timestamp 2022-02-28 20:58:27.964238+09 from replication
> > origin "pg_16395"
> >
> > I'm a bit concerned that the message may be too long.
>
> If you are willing to use abbreviations instead of full
> words/sentences perhaps you can shorten the long CONTEXT part like
> below?
>
> Before:
> CONTEXT: processing remote data during "INSERT" for replication
> target relation "public.test" in transaction 726 committed at LSN
> 0/14BFA88 and timestamp 2022-02-28 20:58:27.964238+09 from
> replication origin "pg_16395"
>
> After:
> CONTEXT: processing remote data during "INSERT" for replication target
> relation "public.test" (txid 726, LSN 0/14BFA88, ts 2022-02-28
> 20:58:27.964238+09, origin "pg_16395")
>
I am wondering whether we can avoid having a timestamp in the message?
If one wants, it can be retrieved from the errors otherwise as well.
For example, I see the below error in my machine:
2022-02-26 07:45:25.092 IST [17644] ERROR: duplicate key value
violates unique constraint "t1_pkey"
2022-02-26 07:45:25.092 IST [17644] DETAIL: Key (c1)=(1) already exists.
2022-02-26 07:45:25.092 IST [17644] CONTEXT: processing remote data
during "INSERT" for replication target relation "public.t1" in
transaction 724 at 2022-02-26 07:45:09.083848+05:30
Now, here, won't the time at the starting of CONTEXT serves our
purpose. If we can remove the timestamp, I think the message won't
appear too long. What do you think?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
