On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 8:17 PM Jelte Fennema
<Jelte.Fennema@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Without this patch concurrent ALTER/DROP SUBSCRIPTION statements for
> the same subscription could result in one of these statements returning the
> following error:
>
> ERROR: XX000: tuple concurrently updated
>
> This patch fixes that by re-fetching the tuple after acquiring the lock on the
> subscription. The included isolation test fails most of its permutations
> without this patch, with the error shown above.
>
Won't the same thing can happen for similar publication commands? Why
is this unique to the subscription and not other Alter/Drop commands?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
