On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:04 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-01-08 11:30:56 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 08/01/2019 00:56, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > A patch at [2] adds display of a table's access method to \d+ - but that
> > > means that running the tests with a different default table access
> > > method (e.g. using PGOPTIONS='-c default_table_access_method=...)
> > > there'll be a significant number of test failures, even though the test
> > > results did not meaningfully differ.
> >
> > For psql, a variable that hides the access method if it's the default.
>
> Yea, I think that seems the least contentious solution.
>
+1.
> Don't like it
> too much, but it seems better than the alternative. I wonder if we want
> one for multiple regression related issues, or whether one specifically
> about table AMs is more appropriate. I lean towards the latter.
>
I didn't understand what is the earlier part "I wonder if we want one
for multiple regression related issues". What do you mean by multiple
regression related issues?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
