On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 3:01 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:40 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:50 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2.
> > +DecodePrepare(LogicalDecodingContext *ctx, XLogRecordBuffer *buf,
> > + xl_xact_parsed_prepare * parsed)
> > +{
> > ..
> > + if (SnapBuildXactNeedsSkip(ctx->snapshot_builder, buf->origptr) ||
> > + (parsed->dbId != InvalidOid && parsed->dbId != ctx->slot->data.database) ||
> > + ctx->fast_forward || FilterByOrigin(ctx, origin_id))
> > + return;
> > +
> >
> > I think this check is the same as the check in DecodeCommit, so you
> > can write some comments to indicate the same and also why we don't
> > need to call ReorderBufferForget here. One more thing is to note is
> > even if we don't need to call ReorderBufferForget here but still we
> > need to execute invalidations (which are present in top-level txn) for
> > the reasons mentioned in ReorderBufferForget. Also, if we do this,
> > don't forget to update the comment atop
> > ReorderBufferImmediateInvalidation.
>
> I have updated the comments. I wasn't sure of when to execute
> invalidations. Should I only
> execute invalidations if this was for another database than what was
> being decoded or should
> I execute invalidation every time we skip?
>
I think so. Did there exist any such special condition in DecodeCommit
or do you have any other reason in your mind for not doing it every
time we skip? We probably might not need to execute when the database
is different (at least I can't think of a reason for the same) but I
guess this doesn't make much difference and it will keep the code
consistent with what we do in DecodeCommit.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
