Re: [PATCH] Provide more information to filter_prepare - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [PATCH] Provide more information to filter_prepare
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KdVg0h0_trfBYReU8NVSeL9SGPPXnuuMDHUzNs7C5t7w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Provide more information to filter_prepare  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Provide more information to filter_prepare  (Markus Wanner <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: [PATCH] Provide more information to filter_prepare  (Markus Wanner <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:42 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 2:07 PM Markus Wanner
> <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 22.03.21 09:50, Markus Wanner wrote:
> > > thank you for reconsidering this patch.  I updated it to include the
> > > required adjustments to the documentation.  Please review.
> >
> > I tweaked the wording in the docs a bit, resulting in a v3 of this patch.
> >
>
> One minor comment:
> -      The callback has to provide the same static answer for a given
> -      <parameter>gid</parameter> every time it is called.
> +       The callback may be invoked several times per transaction to decode and
> +       must provide the same static answer for a given pair of
>
> Why do you think that this callback can be invoked several times per
> transaction? I think it could be called at most two times, once at
> prepare time, then at commit or rollback time. So, I think using
> 'multiple' instead of 'several' times is better.
>

+       to it not being a unique identifier.  Therefore, other systems combine
+       the <parameter>xid</parameter> with a node identifier to form a
+       globally unique transaction identifier.

What exactly is the node identifier here? Is it a publisher or
subscriber node id? We might want to be a bit more explicit here?


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: libpq debug log
Next
From: Markus Wanner
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add concurrent_abort callback for output plugin