Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KdAho_fNkYRe=o=XpxWs_TG4O0V8CJBAvTG8HamWt6OQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes
Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 2:02 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 04:17:59PM -0400, Jonathan Katz wrote:
> > On 5/10/22 11:44 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I have completed the first draft of the PG 15 release notes and you can
> > > see the results here:
> > >
> > >          https://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-15.html
> >
> > Thanks for pulling this together.
> >
> > + Allow logical replication to transfer sequence changes
> >
> > I believe this was reverted in 2c7ea57e5, unless some other parts of this
> > work made it in.
>
> Yes, sorry, I missed that.  Oddly, the unlogged sequence patch was
> retained, even though there is no value for it on the primary.  I
> removed the sentence that mentioned that benefit from the release notes
> since it doesn't apply to PG 15 anymore.
>

+ Create unlogged sequences and allow them to be skipped in logical replication

Is it right to say the second part of the sentence: "allow them to be
skipped in logical replication" when we are not replicating them in
the first place?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: commit remote (sub)transactions in parallel during pre-commit
Next
From: Amul Sul
Date:
Subject: Re: Make relfile tombstone files conditional on WAL level