On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 12:18 PM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 14:01, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 12:54 PM Masahiko Sawada
> > <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here, we can notice that for the index, we are getting context
> > information but not for the heap. The reason is that in
> > vacuum_error_callback, we are not printing additional information for
> > phases VACUUM_ERRCB_PHASE_SCAN_HEAP and VACUUM_ERRCB_PHASE_VACUUM_HEAP
> > when block number is invalid. If we want to cover the 'info' messages
> > then won't it be better if we print a message in those phases even
> > block number is invalid (something like 'while scanning relation
> > \"%s.%s\"")
>
> Yeah, there is an inconsistency. I agree to print the message even
> when the block number is invalid.
>
Okay, I will update this and send this patch and rebased patch to
display offsets later today or tomorrow.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
