Re: Hash Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Hash Indexes
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KU3-4SCaDP0=N=24etVVU2Jgw+0=pcc-pxRGqADJgs7Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hash Indexes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Hash Indexes
Re: Hash Indexes
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> [ new patch ]
>>>
>>> Committed with some further cosmetic changes.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>>> I think it would be worth testing this code with very long overflow
>>> chains by hacking the fill factor up to 1000
>>
>> 1000 is not a valid value for fill factor. Do you intend to say 100?
>
> No.  IIUC, 100 would mean split when the average bucket contains 1
> page worth of tuples.
>

I also think so.

>  I want to split when the average bucket
> contains 10 pages worth of tuples.
>

oh, I think what you mean to say is hack the code to bump fill factor
and then test it.  I was confused that how can user can do that from
SQL command.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators
Next
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench more operators & functions