On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:50 AM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:44 PM Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> VACUUM:
> Not much changes are done in this apart moving the Vacuum visibility
> functions as part of the
> storage. But idea for the Vacuum was with each access method can define how
> it should perform.
>
We are planning to have a somewhat different mechanism for vacuum (for
non-delete marked indexes), so if you can provide some details or
discuss what you have in mind before implementation of same, that
would be great.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
