Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KOVifWtP_6y8y4SkaOJn=4XQVWaZQM-B4S-F=Cn7=mxw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 12:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:26 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 2:11 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I've addressed the above comments and the patch is attached. I've
> > > called it v36-0007.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks, I have pushed this after minor wordsmithing.
> >
>
> The test case is failing on one of the build farm machines. See email
> from Tom Lane [1]. The symptom clearly shows that we are decoding
> empty xacts which can happen due to background activity by autovacuum.
> I think we need a fix similar to what we have done in
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=82a0ba7707e010a29f5fe1a0020d963c82b8f1cb.
>
> I'll try to reproduce and provide a fix for this later today or tomorrow.
>

I have pushed the fix.


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Added schema level support for publication.
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32