On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:18 PM John Naylor <john.naylor@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 7:09 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think the first two patches (a) removal of dead code in bootstrap
> > and (b) the core patch to avoid creation of FSM file for the small
> > table are good now. I have prepared the patches along with commit
> > message. There is no change except for some changes in README and
> > commit message of the second patch. Kindly let me know what you think
> > about them?
>
> Good to hear! The additional language is fine. In "Once the FSM is
> created for heap", I would just change that to "...for a heap".
>
Sure, apart from this I have run pgindent on the patches and make some
changes accordingly. Latest patches attached (only second patch has
some changes). I will take one more pass on Monday morning (28th Jan)
and will commit unless you or others see any problem.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
