Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KJxMhUOADnhAXjShh95DV=Hh-POSo28ciH_TORQjCKbQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby  (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 3:26 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Here is the patch which addresses the above comments. Also optimized
> the test a little bit. Now we use pg_sync_replication_slots() function
> instead of worker to test the operator-redirection using search-patch.
> This has been done to simplify the test case and reduce the added
> time.
>

I have slightly adjusted the comments in the attached, otherwise, LGTM.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yuya Watari
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Relation bulk write facility