On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 4:31 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 3:12 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Maybe a second option is to have replication change any UPDATE into
> > > either an INSERT or a DELETE, if the old or the new row do not pass the
> > > filter, respectively. That way, the databases would remain consistent.
>
> Yeah, I think this is the best way to keep the data consistent.
>
Today, while studying the behavior of this particular operation in
other databases, I found that IBM's InfoSphere Data Replication does
exactly this. See [1]. I think there is a merit if want to follow this
idea.
[1] - https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/idr/11.4.0?topic=rows-search-conditions
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
