Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KFgWGL2XBEyONpYap0trc-Q2rFEe_K-SJhoK+AZ=bebA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Mahendra Singh <mahi6run@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Mahendra Singh <mahi6run@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 2:53 PM Mahendra Singh <mahi6run@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> For small indexes also, we gained some performance by parallel vacuum.
>

Thanks for doing all these tests.  It is clear with this and previous
tests that this patch has benefit in wide variety of cases.  However,
we should try to see some worst cases as well.  For example, if there
are multiple indexes on a table and only one of them is large whereas
all others are very small say having a few 100 or 1000 rows.

Note: Please don't use the top-posting style to reply.  Here, we use
inline reply.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Гурам Дука
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Fix PostgreSQL server build and install problems under MSYS2
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: cost based vacuum (parallel)