Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KCuBGVr+6-LnxAfNiu8zFQVwcnZkB+JbOq2Bu7VTBbpQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep  ("osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 10:44 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> One more comment is that for HEAD, first just create a patch with
> synchronous replication-related doc changes and then write a separate
> patch for prepared transactions.
>

I noticed that docs for "Synchronous replication support for Logical
Decoding" has been introduced by commit
49c0864d7ef5227faa24f903902db90e5c9d5d69 which goes till 9.6. So, I
think you need to create a patch for 9.6 as well unless one of the
existing patches already applies in 9.6.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.