On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 9:35 AM shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com
<shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 12:01 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks. I think it is better to go ahead with this patch and once we
> > > decide what is the right thing to do in terms of GUC then we can try
> > > to add additional tests for this. Anyway, it is not that the code
> > > added by this patch is not getting covered by existing tests. What do
> > > you think?
> >
> > That makes sense to me.
> >
>
> +1
>
Pushed.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
