Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1K7HvhJ4w5B4PorY_mwJyBDFi_K050LjNCGAipkJQQrNw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions  (Neha Sharma <neha.sharma@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:27 PM Neha Sharma
<neha.sharma@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Amit/Dilip,
>
> I have tested a few scenarios on  top of the v56 patches, where the replication worker still had few subtransactions
inuncommitted state and we restart the publisher server.
 
> No crash or data discrepancies were observed, attached are the test scenarios verified.
>

Thanks, I have pushed the fix
(https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=4ab77697f67aa5b90b032b9175b46901859da6d7).

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Include access method in listTables output