On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 3:37 PM Drouvot, Bertrand <bdrouvot@amazon.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> On 8/9/21 10:37 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 12:22 PM Drouvot, Bertrand <bdrouvot@amazon.com> wrote:
> >> Please find enclosed a patch proposal to:
> >>
> >> * Avoid the failed assertion on current master and generate the error message instead (should the code reach that
stage).
> >> * Reset the toast_hash in case of relation rewrite with toast (so that the logical decoding in the above repro is
working).
> >>
> > I think instead of resetting toast_hash for this case why don't we set
> > 'relrewrite' for toast tables as well during rewrite? If we do that
> > then we will simply skip assembling toast chunks for the toast table.
>
> Thanks for looking at it!
>
> I do agree, that would be even better than the current patch approach:
> I'll work on it.
>
> > In make_new_heap(), we are calling NewHeapCreateToastTable() to create
> > toast table where we can pass additional information (probably
> > 'toastid'), if required to set 'relrewrite'. Additionally, let's add a
> > test case if possible for this.
> + 1 for the test case, it will be added in the next version of the patch.
>
Thanks, please see, if you can prepare patches for the back-branches as well.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
