On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich@gmx.de> wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera writes: > > Amit Kapila wrote: > >> It will be helpful if you can find the offending query or plan > >> corresponding to it? > > > > So I suppose the PID of the process starting the workers should be in > > the stack somewhere. > > Ja, it's right on the top, but long gone by now… > > > With that one should be able to attach to that process and get another > > stack trace. I'm curious on whether you would need to have started > > the server with "postgres -T" > > This sounds like it should work to capture more context when the > Assertion fails the next time. >
Sounds good. So can we assume that you will try to get us the new report with more information?
