On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
>> In the appendrel case, I tend to agree that the easiest solution is to
>> scan all the children of the appendrel and just mark the whole thing as
>> not consider_parallel if any of them have unsafe functions.
>>
>
> Thats what I had in mind as well, but not sure which is the best place
> to set it. Shall we do it in set_append_rel_size() after setting the
> size of each relation (after foreach loop) or is it better to do it in
> set_append_rel_pathlist(). Is it better to do it as a separate patch
> or to enhance your patch for this change?
>
I have done it as a separate patch. I think doing it in
set_append_rel_size() has an advantage that we don't need to scan the
child rels separately. If you think that attached patch is on right
lines, then I can add test cases as well.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
