On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 7:52 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-Apr-30, John Naylor wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > As discussed above, we need to issue an
> > > invalidation for following points: (a) when vacuum finds there is no
> > > FSM and page has more space now, I think you can detect this in
> > > RecordPageWithFreeSpace
> >
> > I took a brief look and we'd have to know how much space was there
> > before. That doesn't seem possible without first implementing the idea
> > to save free space locally in the same way the FSM does. Even if we
> > have consensus on that, there's no code for it, and we're running out
> > of time.
>
> Hmm ... so, if vacuum runs and frees up any space from any of the pages,
> then it should send out an invalidation -- it doesn't matter what the
> FSM had, just that there is more free space now. That means every other
> process will need to determine a fresh FSM,
>
I think you intend to say the local space map because once FSM is
created we will send invalidation and we won't further build relcache
entry having local space map.
> but that seems correct.
> Sounds better than keeping outdated entries indicating no-space-available.
>
Agreed, but as mentioned in one of the above emails, I am also bit
scared that it should not lead to many invalidation messages for small
relations, so may be we should send the invalidation message only when
the entire page is empty.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
