Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JaCaCsoowniB+0atg-o1h27JFQE3ENV-gKLeZ0-e0i3g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication
Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 1:12 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 5:44 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have done some more testing of this patch especially for the case
> > where we spill before streaming the transaction and found everything
> > is working as expected. Additionally, I have changed a few more
> > comments and ran pgindent. I am still not very sure whether we want to
> > display physical slots in this view as all the stats are for logical
> > slots but anyway we can add stats w.r.t physical slots in the future.
> > I am fine either way (don't show physical slots in this view or show
> > them but keep stats as 0). Let me know if you have any thoughts on
> > these points, other than that I am happy with the current state of the
> > patch.
>
> IMHO, It will make more sense to only show the logical replication
> slots in this view.
>

Okay, Sawada-San, others, do you have any opinion on this matter?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions