Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JUZFOiMpg5R8SJp=0w+zE15bOP+HxFbfmL29CjyUy1aw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 9:58 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>

I have pushed the remaining part of this patch. Now, we can review the
proposed documentation part.

I feel we don't need the Examples sub-section for this part of the
docs. The behavior is quite clear from the "Behavior Summary"
sub-section table. Also, I don't find the sub-sections 29.6.1 and
29.6.2 are worth mentioning as separate sub-chapters.

*
+     non-PostgreSQL database via plugin output,

In the above sentence, shouldn't it be 'output plugin' instead of
'plugin output'? We use that way at other places in the docs.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options