Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JPEoYAkggmLqbdD+cF=kWNpLkZb_wJ8eqj0QD2AjBTBA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
RE: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:41 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 6:27 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Amit.
> >
> > PSA a small collection of feedback patches you can apply on top of the
> > patch v65-0001 if you decide they are OK.
> >
> > (There are all I have found after a first pass over all the recent changes).
> >
>
> I have spell-checked the content of v65-0001.
>
> PSA a couple more feedback patches to apply on top of v65-0001 if you
> decide they are ok.
>

I have incorporated all your changes and additionally made few more
changes (a) got rid of LogicalRepBeginPrepareData and instead used
LogicalRepPreparedTxnData, (b) made a number of changes in comments
and docs, (c) ran pgindent, (d) modified tests to use standard
wait_for_catch function and removed few tests to reduce the time and
to keep regression tests reliable.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: default result formats setting
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal - psql - use pager for \watch command