On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:52 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:17 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:11 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:00 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > During recent developments in the vacuum, it has been noticed [1] that
> > > > parallel vacuum workers don't use any buffer access strategy. I think
> > > > we can fix it either by propagating the required information from the
> > > > leader or just get the access strategy in each worker separately. The
> > > > patches for both approaches for PG-13 are attached.
> > >
> > > Thank you for starting the new thread.
> > >
> > > I'd prefer to just have parallel vacuum workers get BAS_VACUUM buffer
> > > access strategy. If we want to have set different buffer access
> > > strategies or ring buffer sizes for the leader and worker processes,
> > > the former approach would be better. But I think we're unlikely to
> > > want to do that, especially in back branches.
> > >
> >
> > Fair enough. Just to be clear, you prefer to go with
> > fix_access_strategy_workers_11.patch, right?
>
> That's right.
>
Okay, I'll wait for a day or two to see if anyone else has comments or
suggestions.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
