Re: logical replication empty transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: logical replication empty transactions
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JCv5QPyjU6N_G=qChsb3DearoQTXk7ZPxYEeMWDyPFDw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logical replication empty transactions  (Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: logical replication empty transactions
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 12:33 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 11:44 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Fixed.
> >

Review comments/suggestions:
=========================
1. Isn't it sufficient to call pgoutput_send_begin from
maybe_send_schema as that is commonplace for all others and is always
the first message we send? If so, I think we can remove it from other
places?
2. Can we write some comments to explain why we don't skip streaming
or prepared empty transactions and some possible solutions (the
protocol change and additional subscription parameter as discussed
[1]) as discussed in this thread pgoutput.c?
3. Can we add a simple test for it in one of the existing test
files(say in 001_rep_changes.pl)?
4. I think we can drop the skip streaming patch as we can't do that for now.


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: support for MERGE
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical replication timeout problem