On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 9:10 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
>
> There are basically two good reasons to back-patch comment changes:
>
> * fear that the comment is wrong enough to mislead people looking
> at the older branch;
>
> * fear that leaving it alone will create a merge hazard for future
> back-patches.
>
> It doesn't seem to me that either of those is a strong concern
> in this case. In the absence of these concerns, back-patching
> seems like make-work (and useless expenditure of buildfarm
> cycles).
>
Agreed. I'll push this to HEAD after some time.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
