At Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:19:22 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote in
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 9:10 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > There are basically two good reasons to back-patch comment changes:
> >
> > * fear that the comment is wrong enough to mislead people looking
> > at the older branch;
> >
> > * fear that leaving it alone will create a merge hazard for future
> > back-patches.
> >
> > It doesn't seem to me that either of those is a strong concern
> > in this case. In the absence of these concerns, back-patching
> > seems like make-work (and useless expenditure of buildfarm
> > cycles).
> >
>
> Agreed. I'll push this to HEAD after some time.
Thanks for committing, and for the clarification about back-patching
policy!
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
