Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+zFLVUz_d984v-qJWxct1S+9dQuEh00+iePif67sQXuw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 7:50 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > * If you do the above then there won't be a need to change the
> > variable name is_parallel_apply_worker in logicalrep_worker_launch.
> >
>
> Done.
>

I don't think the addition of two new macros isTablesyncWorker() and
isLeaderApplyWorker() adds much value, so removed those and ran
pgindent. I am planning to commit this patch early next week unless
you or others have any comments.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: logicalrep_worker_launch -- counting/checking the worker limits
Next
From: Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Date:
Subject: Re: Inconsistent results with libc sorting on Windows