Re: subscription/t/010_truncate.pl failure on desmoxytes in REL_13_STABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: subscription/t/010_truncate.pl failure on desmoxytes in REL_13_STABLE
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+z2zBtj+B4qkGYKVGziYN2DdvsgGitBmSA=sX4-+=s+A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: subscription/t/010_truncate.pl failure on desmoxytes in REL_13_STABLE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: subscription/t/010_truncate.pl failure on desmoxytes in REL_13_STABLE
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 6:54 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> BTW, the reason that the walsender is still showing its "query" as
> >> "SELECT pg_config..." is that pre-v14 versions don't update the
> >> reported query for replication commands, only plain-SQL commands.
> >> I recall that we fixed that in HEAD awhile ago; should we consider
> >> back-patching something for it?
>
> > I think it would be great if we can do that. Analyzing such failures
> > and in general for replication errors that will be a nice improvement
> > and make the jobs of many people a bit easier.
>
> Checking the git history, this was fixed in f560209c6, which also
> included some other mostly-cosmetic cleanup.  I'm inclined to
> propose back-patching that whole commit, rather than allowing the
> code in exec_replication_command() to diverge in different branches.
> It looks like it applies cleanly as far back as v10.  Maybe something
> could be done for 9.6 as well, but since that branch is so close to
> EOL, I doubt it's worth spending extra effort on it.
>

+1.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: PG Docs for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH PUBLICATION - copy_data option
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Adding more PGDLLIMPORTs