On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Isn't it better to call clamp_row_est in join costing functions as we
>>> are doing in cost_seqscan()? Is there a reason to keep those
>>> different?
>>
>> No, those should probably be changed to match.
>
> So I guess that'd look something like this?
>
Yes, the patch looks good to me.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
