Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+qwkFonAWovoOtTw7TiiyFroP9_KmCM8fQWKNNpXvK+w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:30 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have merged bugs_and_review_comments_fix.patch changes to 0001 and 0002.
>

I was wondering whether we have checked the code coverage after this
patch?  Previously, the existing tests seem to be covering most parts
of the function ReorderBufferSerializeTXN [1].  After this patch, the
timing to call ReorderBufferSerializeTXN will change, so that might
impact the testing of the same.  If it is already covered, then I
would like to either add a new test or extend existing test with the
help of new spill counters.  If it is not getting covered, then we
need to think of extending the existing test or write a new test to
cover the function ReorderBufferSerializeTXN.

[1] - https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c.gcov.html

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - extend initialization phase control
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum