Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect and hash indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> While trying to figure out some bloating in the newly logged hash indexes,
>>>> I'm looking into the type of each page in the index.  But I get an error:
>>>>
>>>> psql -p 9876 -c "select hash_page_type(get_raw_page('foo_index_idx',x)) from
>>>> generate_series(1650,1650) f(x)"
>>>>
>>>> ERROR:  page is not a hash page
>>>> DETAIL:  Expected 0000ff80, got 00000000.
>>>>
>>>> The contents of the page are:
>>>>
>>>> \xa4000000d8f203bf65c900001800f01ff01f0420...
>>>>
>>>> (where the elided characters at the end are all zero)
>>>>
>>>> What kind of page is that actually?
>>>
>>> it is basically either a newly allocated bucket page or a freed overflow page.
>>>
>>
>> What makes you think that it can be a newly allocated page?
>> Basically, we always initialize the special space of newly allocated
>> page, so not sure what makes you deduce that it can be newly allocated
>> page.
>
> I came to know this from the following experiment.
>
> I  created a hash index and kept on inserting data in it till the split happens.
>
> When split happened, I could see following values for firstblock and
> lastblock in _hash_alloc_buckets()
>
> Breakpoint 1, _hash_alloc_buckets (rel=0x7f6ac951ee30, firstblock=34,
> nblocks=32) at hashpage.c:993
> (gdb) n
> (gdb) p    firstblock
> $15 = 34
> (gdb) p    nblocks
> $16 = 32
> (gdb) n
> (gdb) p    lastblock
> $17 = 65
>
> AFAIU, this bucket split resulted in creation of new bucket pages from
> block number 34 to 65.
>
> The contents for metap are as follows,
>
> (gdb) p    *metap
> $18 = {hashm_magic = 105121344,    hashm_version = 2, hashm_ntuples =
> 2593, hashm_ffactor = 81, hashm_bsize = 8152, hashm_bmsize = 4096,
> hashm_bmshift = 15,
>   hashm_maxbucket = 32,    hashm_highmask = 63, hashm_lowmask = 31,
> hashm_ovflpoint = 6, hashm_firstfree = 0, hashm_nmaps = 1,
> hashm_procid = 450,
>   hashm_spares = {0, 0,    0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0 <repeats 25 times>},
> hashm_mapp = {33,    0 <repeats 127 times>}}
>
> Now, if i try to check the page type for block number 65, this is what i see,
>
> test=# select * from hash_page_type(get_raw_page('con_hash_index', 65));
> ERROR:  page is not a hash page
> DETAIL:  Expected 0000ff80, got 00000000.
> test=#
>

The contents of such a page should be zero and Jeff has reported some
valid-looking contents of the page.  If you see this page contents as
zero, then we can conclude what Jeff is seeing was an freed overflow
page.


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com