On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This seems better, after checking at other places I found that for
>> invalid type we are using ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT and for invalid
>> functions we are using ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_FUNCTION. So I have done the
>> same way.
>>
>> Updated patch attached.
>
> I found some more places where we can get similar error and updated in
> my v3 patch.
>
@@ -412,7 +412,9 @@ plpgsql_validator(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) /* Get the new function's pg_proc entry */ tuple =
SearchSysCache1(PROCOID,ObjectIdGetDatum(funcoid)); if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tuple))
- elog(ERROR, "cache lookup failed for function %u", funcoid);
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_FUNCTION),
+ errmsg("function with OID %u does not exist", funcoid)));
If you are making changes in plpgsql_validator(), then shouldn't we
make changes in plperl_validator() or plpython_validator()? I see
that you have made changes to function CheckFunctionValidatorAccess()
which seems to be getting called from *_validator() (* indicates
plpgsql/plperl/plpython) functions. Is there a reason for changing
the *_validator() function?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
