On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:03 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:00 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>
> The idea I have is to additionally check that we are decoding
> > streaming or prepared transaction (the same check as we have for
> > setting curtxn) or we can check if CheckXidAlive is a valid
> > transaction id. What do you think?
>
> I think a check based on CheckXidAlive looks good to me. This will
> protect against if a similar error is raised from any other path as
> you mentioned above.
>
We can't use CheckXidAlive because it is reset by that time. So, I
used the other approach which led to the attached.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
