Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+X_R5=YhRmpREkS1i9z9KuxroLi-0dkh+1sPduibzAiw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests
Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 12:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:08 PM shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com
> > <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've attached updated patches that incorporated the above comments as
> > well as the comment from Amit.
> >
> > BTW regarding 0001 patch to remove the duplicated wait, should we
> > backpatch to v15?
> >
>
> I think it is good to clean this test case even for PG15 even though
> there is no major harm in keeping it. I'll push this early next week
> by Tuesday unless someone thinks otherwise.
>

Pushed this one and now I'll look at your other patch.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.