On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Fujii Masao <
masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Amit Kapila <
amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Fujii Masao <
masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Or what about removing tablespace_map file at the beginning of recovery
> >> whenever backup_label doesn't exist?
> >
> > Yes, thats another way, but is it safe to assume that user won't need
> > that file,
>
> Is there really case where tablespace_map is necessary even though backup_label
> doesn't exist? If not, it seems safe to get rid of the file when backup_label
> is not present.
>
> > I mean in the valid scenario (where both backup_label and
> > tablespace_map are present and usable) also, we rename them to
> > *.old rather than deleting it.
>
> Yep, I'm OK to make the recovery rename the file to *.old rather than delete it.
>
This sounds safe to me, unless anybody else has different opinion
I will write a patch to fix this way.
