On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:31 AM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 19:35, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 6:39 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:48 PM Tomas Vondra
> > > <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:58:18AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > > >On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:32 AM Masahiko Sawada
> > > > ><masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 06:57, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >What if the decoding has been performed by multiple backends using the
> > > > >> > >same slot? In that case, it will be difficult to make the judgment
> > > > >> > >for the value of logical_decoding_work_mem based on stats. It would
> > > > >> > >make sense if we provide a way to set logical_decoding_work_mem for a
> > > > >> > >slot but not sure if that is better than what we have now.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I thought that the stats are relevant to what
> > > > >> logical_decoding_work_mem value was but not with who performed logical
> > > > >> decoding. So even if multiple backends perform logical decoding using
> > > > >> the same slot, the user can directly use stats as long as
> > > > >> logical_decoding_work_mem value doesn’t change.
> > > > >>
> >
> > Today, I thought about it again, and if we consider the point that
> > logical_decoding_work_mem value doesn’t change much then having the
> > stats at slot-level would also allow computing
> > logical_decoding_work_mem based on stats. Do you think it is a
> > reasonable assumption that users won't change
> > logical_decoding_work_mem for different processes (WALSender, etc.)?
>
> FWIW, if we use logical_decoding_work_mem as a threshold of starting
> of sending changes to a subscriber, I think there might be use cases
> where the user wants to set different logical_decoding_work_mem values
> to different wal senders. For example, setting a lower value to
> minimize the latency of synchronous logical replication to a near-site
> whereas setting a large value to minimize the amount of data sent to a
> far site.
>
How does setting a large value can minimize the amount of data sent?
One possibility is if there are a lot of transaction aborts and
transactions are not large enough that they cross
logical_decoding_work_mem threshold but such cases shouldn't be many.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
